[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49CA32F6.2030408@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:34:46 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
rmk@....linux.org.uk, starvik@...s.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
davem@...emloft.net, cooloney@...nel.org, kyle@...artin.ca,
matthew@....cx, grundler@...isc-linux.org, takata@...ux-m32r.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, rth@...ddle.net,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [GIT RFC] percpu: use dynamic percpu allocator as the default
percpu allocator
Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:21:03 +0900
> Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>>>> Martin's original patch should do the trick although it would be
>>>> slower for static symbols. I'll merge it and post the tree.
>>> No, my original patch doesn't work. It will break modules that use
>>> static per-cpu variables.
>> Oops. Even with the default offset adding macros? Heh... I think it
>> would be best to wait for your fix then.
>
> We could use HAVE_LEGACY_PER_CPU_AREA for the time being.
Eh... The thing is that the patch kills the legacy default allocator.
We can move it into arch/s390 for the time being but it would be
simpler if the constant_p thing or something else could work. :-) Do
you think figuring out how to fix it will take long?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists