[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903250943060.5675@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:43:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [PATCH][GIT PULL] remove unnecessary (un)likelys
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > ----
> > arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 4 ++--
> > kernel/sched.c | 4 ++--
> > kernel/sched_rt.c | 2 +-
> > mm/rmap.c | 8 ++++----
> > mm/slab.c | 2 +-
> > mm/slob.c | 2 +-
> > mm/slub.c | 2 +-
> > 7 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> I commented on the ptrace one - i think we should take that one out
> or at least wait for more info.
>
> The MM ones look correct. Maybe your kfree observation will be
> debated - but i think it's probably right that we should not special
> annotate kfree(NULL) anymore in any direction. But it's ultimately
> up to the MM folks. (I've Cc:-ed Pekka too)
>
> The rmap and the scheduler ones definitely look correct. When you
> rebase, please include the profiler output to 3/5 too.
I'll rebase it to only include the non controversial changes.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists