linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] [GIT PULL] remove unlikelys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090325161913.GB1411@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:19:13 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] [GIT PULL] remove unlikelys


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> Ingo,
> 
> The differences between v1 and v2 is that I only included the non 
> controversial patches. I also modified the change log of 
> pre_schedule_rt to include the annotated branch profiler output.

>       mm: remove unlikelys for unlock in rmap.c

>  mm/rmap.c         |    8 ++++----

the rmap.c thing looks uncontroversial to me, but an MM person 
should still have a look and Ack it.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/