[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090325170533.GA4667@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:05:33 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Anyone working on ftrace function graph support on ARM?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:34:07AM -0700, Tim Bird wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > As pointed out in my previous mail, identifying where on the stack the
> > return address is stored is only possible for OABI with frame pointers.
> >
> > EABI will probably be possible with the stack unwinding code, but it
> > probably won't be cheap. The EABI unwinder is scheduled for merging
> > during the present now-open merge window.
EABI with frame pointers should work, too, shouldn't it?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists