| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49CA64D8.9040602@trash.net> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:07:36 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: Francis.Dupont@...pont.fr, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, Francis_Dupont@....org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: netfilter spurious ELOOP David Miller wrote: > From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@...pont.fr> > Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:02:05 +0100 > > Adding correct CC:'s > >> summary: iptables command gets spurious ELOOP errors >> >> report: when a rule with a target like MARK --set-mark 0x80000001 >> then adding new other rules can failed with "Too many levels of symbolic >> links" (aka ELOOP) error. >> The problem is in kernel net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c in the >> mark_source_chains() routine which checks the verdict field of >> targets even for not standard targets. >> >> keywords: netfilter target eloop >> >> environment: recent gentoo and fedora. Problem not fixed in >> linux-2.6.29 (last stable version taken from kernel.org some minutes ago). Just to clarify: does the problem happens when you have the MARK rule above in a user-defined chain that has more then one jump leading to it or does it also happen in other cases? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists