[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49CA678A.30606@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:19:06 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Alex.Zeffertt" <Alex.Zeffertt@...rix.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevent: on resume program the next oneshot tick with
the next actual event
Ian Campbell wrote:
> When resuming a Xen domU we were seeing an issue where the timer ticks never
> seemed to start up again. This was with CONFIG_NO_HZ=y, the Xen clocksource
> has CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT but not CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC.
>
> The issue is that on resume tick_resume_oneshot() tries to program an event for
> "now", e.g.
> tick_program_event(ktime_get(), 1);
>
> However further down the call chain tick_dev_program_event() then compares that
>
Where's that? Do you mean in clockevents_program_event():
delta = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(expires, now));
if (delta <= 0)
return -ETIME;
?
> expiry time with a second call to ktime_get() and discards the event if the
> timeout is negative -- which it always will be since some time must have passed
> since tick_program_event was called.
>
> Instead of asking for an immediate event on resume, instead ask for the next
> actual event.
>
What if the next event is now anyway? What timebase is it in anyway?
> With this fix I can successfully resume a Xen domain.
>
That's good, but I think there's more going on here.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists