linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29: can't resume from suspend with DMAR (intel iommu) enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090325173850.GD14250@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:38:50 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29: can't resume from suspend with DMAR (intel iommu)
	enabled


* mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:32:59PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > (Cc:s added)
> > 
> > * Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On vanilla 2.6.29 (on Ubuntu 8.10), on a Lenovo x200s, my system 
> > > is completely hosed on resume.  It appears that even hard disk IO 
> > > didn't work (trying to do *anything* including getting a dmesg 
> > > trace just spewed sda io errors to the console).  Hence no trace.  
> > > I did an alt-sysrq-b and the screen went blank and the machine 
> > > just started beeping at me.
> > > 
> > > Resume works much better with intel_iommu=off.  (I remember seeing 
> > > a patch go by that purported to fix resume with IOMMU enabled, but 
> > > it didn't work for me.)
> > > 
> > > I'd be happy to try to make a better bug report if anyone has any 
> > > bright ideas.
> > 
> > i have a Lenovo T500 that does not even boot with with DMAR enabled 
> > in the BIOS (it's default-off), i get this panic in early bootup:
> > 
> >     DMAR hardware is malfunctioning
> 
> That happens when the polling of the IOMMU registers fail to 
> behave as expected in the VT-d specification.  Typically its been 
> a bios issue when this happens.

it's hugely problematic to panic() the box early during bootup. 
IOMMU code should be disabled instead, a warning emitted - and life 
should continue.

With the current method you only ensure that distros turn DMAR 
support off and that users disable it in their BIOS. That's a double 
disadvantage.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/