[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb0375e10903251353r367294d1ra00226e030594a32@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:53:22 -0400
From: Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com>
To: fenghua.yu@...el.com
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, dwmw2@...radead.org, kyle@...hat.com,
mgross@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support
It looks like patch 1 calls dmar_reenable_qi but patch 2 defines it.
In 2.6.29, there's no dmar_disable_qi that I can see. Can you respin
these against something a little less scary than -tip during a merge
window? (Especially since -stable will need this soon.)
Thanks,
Andy
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:45 PM, <fenghua.yu@...el.com> wrote:
> Current Intel IOMMU does not support suspend and resume. In S3 event, kernel
> crashes when IOMMU is enabled. The attached patch set implements the suspend and
> resume feature for Intel IOMMU. It hooks to kernel suspend and resume interface.
> When suspend happens, it saves necessary hardware registers. When resume happens
> it restores the registers and restarts IOMMU.
>
> This patch set is applied to the tip tree.
>
> --
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists