[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1238024827.2085.60.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:47:07 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com, amluto@...il.com, kyle@...hat.com,
mgross@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support for DMAR
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 21:12 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > +static int iommu_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> > + struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> > + unsigned long flag;
> > + int i = 0;
> > +
> > + if (init_iommu_hw())
> > + panic("IOMMU setup failed, DMAR can not start!\n");
>
> Please dont panic boxes ... insert a WARN() and return.
Well, the box is going to die anyway. If it was using the IOMMU before
suspend, and you fail to re-initialise the IOMMU after resume, then
you're buggered.
But if you panic() immediately during the resume, the message is
unlikely to make it out even to a serial console. If you print a warning
and limp on, I suppose there's at least a _chance_ that it might get
seen.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists