| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:44:16 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: dan.j.williams@...el.com
Cc: maciej.sosnowski@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: Add privatecnt to revert DMA_PRIVATE propery
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:27:27 -0700, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> >> > Currently dma_request_channel() set DMA_PRIVATE capability but never
> >> > clear it. So if a public channel was once grabbed by
> >> > dma_request_channel(), the device stay PRIVATE forever. Add
> >> > privatecnt member to dma_device to correctly revert it.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
> >>
> >> This looks good to me. Please rebase it on top of the 'next' branch
> >> of the async_tx tree[1] and I will queue it for -next.
> >>
> > Sorry, I have missed this mail. I will rebase it, but while the
> > 'next' branch of async_tx tree lacks commit 287d85 ("atmel-mci: fix
> > initialization of dma slave data"), rebasing will cause another
> > conflict with mainline. What should I do?
>
> I have updated the 'next' branch to include this commit.
Thanks. And now the patch can be applied using git-am as is.
Should I rebase and send again?
---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists