lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:19:45 +0000 From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Cc: Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>, Toshiharu Harada <haradats@...data.co.jp>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Are path-based LSM hooks called from the wrong places? On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 04:14:26PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > As I said, what I don't want to have to do is attempt to regenerate the full > pathname, especially if the pathname isn't accessible from within the current > process's chroot or namespace. ... and if it's not accessible from said process' namespace, pathname-based checks are going to produce really bizarre results. IOW, I'd say that such checks simply don't apply in case of fscache. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists