linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: move vmware to hypervisor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1238085621.21971.3.camel@alok-dev1>
Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:40:21 -0700
From:	Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
To:	"david@...g.hm" <david@...g.hm>
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: move vmware to hypervisor

On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 00:10 -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Alok Kataria wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:38 -0700, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >> I am not saying we should not hide this behind a config at all. The
> >> point is there is nothing that we save by adding a new config, so what's
> >> the point at all. If you can give me a solid reason like, say, you save
> >> 1% code space with this config option, or 'n' sec in the boottime,  I am
> >> all ears for such an argument.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > So, if there are any tangible benefits with doing this I am ok with it,
> > but your current argument about "Freedom to user"  doesn't sound too
> > compelling.
> 
> isn't it the other way around? you are adding this in, it should be up to 
> you to show that it
> 
> A. has no impact
> 
> B. has a small enough impact that it's not worth the config option

This is what exactly I have mentioned in a mail earlier in this thread.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/25/333

Alok

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/