[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903261814.07375.elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:14:02 +0100
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: Jose Celestino <japc@...sapo.pt>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
jack@...e.cz, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, arjan@...radead.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, npiggin@...e.de, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
drees76@...il.com, jesper@...gh.cc, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, roland@...hat.com
Subject: Re: relatime: update once per day patches (was: ext3 IO latency measurements)
On Thursday 26 March 2009, Jose Celestino wrote:
> Words by Theodore Tso [Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:30:26PM -0400]:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:14:28AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > I generally agree witht he "leave policy to user space" people, but
> > > this is an area where (a) user space has shown itself to not get it
> > > right (ie people don't do even the existing relatime because
> > > distros don't) and (b) what's the alternative?
> >
> > I thought at least some distro's were adding relatime by default; I
> > could be wrong, but I thought Ubuntu was doing this.
>
> Yes.
No, not the "pure" relatime that's in the upstream kernel. And that's the
whole point here. See my direct reply to Ted.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists