[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090325.170352.95221419.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jarkao2@...il.com
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, mingo@...e.hu,
r.schwebel@...gutronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
blaschka@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: Revert "gro: Fix legacy path napi_complete crash",
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:54:56 +0100
> Herbert Xu wrote, On 03/25/2009 01:26 PM:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:20:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> ok - i have started testing the delta below, on top of the plain
> >> revert.
> >
> > Thanks! BTW Ingo, any chance you could help us identify the problem
> > with the previous patch? I don't have a forcedeth machine here
> > and the hang you had with my patch that open-coded __napi_complete
> > appears intimately connected to forcedeth (with NAPI enabled).
>
> Of course it's too late for verifying this now, but (for the future)
> I think, this scenario could be considered:
>
> process_backlog() netif_rx()
>
> if (!skb)
> local_irq_enable()
> if (queue.qlen) //NO
> napi_schedule() //NOTHING
> __skb_queue_tail() //qlen > 0
> napi_complete()
> ... ...
> Every next netif_rx() sees
> qlen > 0, so napi is never
> scheduled again.
>
> Then, something like this might work...
Excellent detective work, I would have never figured this one
out.
Herbert can you take a good look at this can confirm Jarek's
findings?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists