[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090325.205745.208859329.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: kyle@...fetthome.net, jeff@...zik.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
tytso@....edu, hch@...radead.org, jack@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
arjan@...radead.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, npiggin@...e.de,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, drees76@...il.com, jesper@...gh.cc,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
> For example, the latest one came from git actually checking the error code
> from 'close()'. Tell me the last time you saw anybody do that in a real
> program. Hint: it's just not done. EVER.
Emacs does it too, and I know that you consider GNU emacs to be the
definition of abnormal :-)
That's how we found some misbehaviors in NFS a while ago, we used to
return -EAGAIN or something like that from close() on NFS files. This
was like 12 years ago and it gave emacs massive heartburn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists