[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49CAC982.4050507@gaisler.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:17:06 +0100
From: Jiri Gaisler <jiri@...sler.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@...il.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: next-20090310: ext4 hangs
Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the updated disassembly.
>
>> 55bab0: 82 10 60 01 or %g1, 1, %g1
>> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>> 55bab4: 40 06 4b 20 call 6ee734 <_spin_unlock>
>> 55bab8: c2 24 e0 28 st %g1, [ %l3 + 0x28 ]
> OK, so it really seems that:
> jinode->i_flags |= JI_COMMIT_RUNNING;
> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
>
> has been compiled to
> ld [ %l3 + 0x28 ], %g1
> or %g1, 1, %g1
> call 6ee734 <_spin_unlock>
> st %g1, [ %l3 + 0x28 ]
>
> Which seems like a bug in the compiler or in the way implement compiler
> barriers in spin_unlock() on UP sparc. Or is there some sparc magic by which
> this is correct code? Any clever sparc guy?
>
> Honza
Looks fine to me - the store is made in the branch delay slot
of the call, so it will occur before the first instruction at
the call target address executes.
Jiri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists