[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49CB1F90.3090501@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:24:16 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Kyle Moffett <kyle@...fetthome.net>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
David Rees <drees76@...il.com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
Kyle Moffett wrote:
> Really, I think virtually all of the database programs would be
> perfectly happy with an "fsbarrier(fd, flags)" syscall, where if "fd"
> points to a regular file or directory then it instructs the underlying
> filesystem to do whatever internal barrier it supports, and if not
> just fail with -ENOTSUPP (so you can fall back to fdatasync(), etc).
> Perhaps "flags" would allow a "data" or "metadata" barrier, but if not
> it's not a big issue.
If you want a per-fd barrier call, there is always sync_file_range(2)
> If a user-level tool needs to enforce ordering
> between IOs the only tool right now is is a full flush
or sync_file_range(2)...
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists