[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1238143759.7808.2885.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:49:19 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Question about PRIVATE_FUTEX
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 11:12 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi, Peter and Eric.
>
> I am not expert about futex.
> I am sorry if this is dumb question.
>
> If we use private futex, get_futex_key don't call get_user_pages_fast
> which pins page at page table.
But also drops that page ref at the end of get_futex_key(). The whole
and only purpose of using get_user_pages_fast() is to get at the mapping
data without having to obtain the mmap_sem.
> Then, get_futex_value_locked calls __cpy_from_user_inatomic with
> pagefault_disable.
>
> Who make sure the user page is mapped at app's page table ?
Nobody, all uses of get_futex_value_locked() have to deal with it
returning -EFAULT.
Most of this is legacy btw, from when futex ops were done under the
mmap_sem. Back then we couldn't fault because that would cause mmap_sem
recursion. Howver, now that we don't hold mmap_sem anymore we could use
a faulting user access like get_user().
Darren has been working on patches to clean that up, some of those are
already merged in the -tip tree.
HTH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists