[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090327140640.5aa99535@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:06:40 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, mjg@...hat.com, tytso@....edu,
mingo@...e.hu, jack@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arjan@...radead.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, npiggin@...e.de,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, drees76@...il.com, jesper@...gh.cc,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com, roland@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Make relatime default
> Why? RELATIME has been around since 2006 now.
The workable fixes to relatime (the always update once per 24 hours) you
only just comitted - and did come from a vendor.
It also looks btw that we don't want to have a "relatime" option and a
"strictatime" option and a "relatimebutdoitevery24hrs" option.
All three of these are the same thing so it should (regardless of default
choice) be
relatime=n
n = 0 ('update if its more than 0 seconds out of date') =
strictatime
n = MAXINT (basically equals relatime)
n = 24hrs (the new 'fixed' relatime but not too relative)
n = anything else - user tuned
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists