[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1238171805.8275.2434.camel@gaiman.anholt.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:36:45 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: DRM lock ordering fix series
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:19 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 10:34 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> writes:
> >
> > > Here's hopefully the final attempt at the lock ordering fix for GEM. The
> > > problem was introduced in .29 with the GTT mapping support. We hashed out
> > > a few potential fixes on the mailing list and at OSTS. Peter's plan was
> > > to use get_user_pages, but it has significant CPU overhead (10% cost to text
> > > rendering, though part of that is due to some dumb userland code. But it's
> > > dumb userland code we're all running).
> >
> >
> > You are aware that there is a fast path now (get_user_pages_fast) which
> > is significantly faster? (but has some limitations)
>
> In the code I have, get_user_pages_fast is just a wrapper that calls the
> get_user_pages in the way that I'm calling it from the DRM.
Ah, I see: that's a weak stub, and there is a real implementation. I
didn't know we could do weak stubs.
Still, needs docs badly.
--
Eric Anholt
eric@...olt.net eric.anholt@...el.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists