linux-kernel - Using POWER or APM for battery handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090327202406.60885d4a.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:24:06 +0100
From:	Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com>
To:	cbou@...l.ru
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Using POWER or APM for battery handling

Hey Anton,

My machines (HP Jornada 600-series and HP Jornada 700-series) both
rely on batteries for power. Now, in the past it has all
been handled by an APM_EMULATION driver that
essentially detects the current state (loading YES/NO, 
POWER_LEFT, ESTIMATED TIME LEFT,...) and adjusts
the state of the machine.

My question is should I port this to instead
use the power class (drivers/power) or not.

The batteries are same for both 600/700 but
contain no internal chip so I would need
seperate battery drivers for both machines.

Best wishes
Kristoffer Ericson

-- 
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com>

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped