[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903271443440.3994@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rees <drees76@...il.com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> On the other side of the coin, major desktop apps Firefox and Thunderbird
> already use it: Firefox uses sqlite [...]
You do know that Firefox had to _disable_ fsync() exactly because not
disabling it was unacceptable? That whole "why does firefox stop for 5
seconds" thing created too many bug-reports.
> So, arguments about "people should..." aside, existing desktops apps _do_
> fsync and we get to deal with the bad performance :/
No they don't. Read up on it. Really.
Guys, I don't understand why you even argue. I've been complaining about
fsync() performance for the last five years or so. It's taken you a long
time to finally realize, and you still don't seem to "get it".
PEOPLE LITERALLY REMOVE 'fsync()' CALLS BECAUSE THEY ARE UNACCEPTABLE FOR
USERS.
It really is that simple.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists