[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903271522210.3994@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rees <drees76@...il.com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> The values are: 0 = off, 1 = normal, 2 = full.
Of course, I don't actually know that "off" really means "never fsync". It
may be that it only cuts down on the number of fsync's. I do know that
firefox with the original defaults ("fsync everywhere") was totally
unusable, and that got fixed.
But maybe it got fixed to "only pauses occasionally" rather than "every
single page load brings everything to a screetching halt".
Of course, your browsing history database is an excellent example of
something you should _not_ care about that much, and where performance is
a lot more important than "ooh, if the machine goes down suddenly, I need
to be 100% up-to-date". Using fsync on that thing was just stupid, even
regardless of any ext3 issues.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists