[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090327230341.GF5176@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:03:41 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext3: Avoid starting a transaction in writepage
when not necessary
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:23:46PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 27-03-09 16:24:31, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >
> > We don't have to start a transaction in writepage() when all the blocks
> > are a properly allocated. Even in ordered mode either the data has been
> > written via write() and they are thus already added to transaction's list
> > or the data was written via mmap and then it's random in which transaction
> > they get written anyway.
> >
> > This should help VM to pageout dirty memory without blocking on transaction
> > commits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> Please, use the patch below instead (and I'd also wait a few days for
> Mingo to check whether it also helps him). It also changes data=writeback
> mode in the same way and it adheres to coding style...
FYI, Looks like Linus has already cherry-picked your first patch from
LKML and dropped it into mainline. My other two patches haven't gone
in yet as far as I can tell.
So we'll need to do a delta patch that has the differences from your
new patch and what Linus has already pulled into mainline.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists