linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, David Rees <drees76@...il.com>,
	Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29

On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> Why does everyone just sit around waiting for the kernel to put a new
> value into two magic numbers which userspace scripts could have set?
> 
> My /etc/rc.local has been tweaking dirty_ratio, dirty_background_ratio
> and swappiness for many years.  I guess I'm just incredibly advanced.

.. and as a result you're also testing something that nobody else is.

Look at the complaints from people about fsync behavior that Ted says he 
cannot see. Let me guess: it's because Ted probably has tweaked his 
environment, because he is advanced. As a result, other people see 
problems, he does not.

That's not "advanced". That's totally f*cking broken.

Having different distributions tweak all those tweakables is just even 
_more_ so. It's the anti-thesis of "advanced". It's just stupid.

We should aim to get it right. The "user space can tweak any numbers they 
want" is ALWAYS THE WRONG ANSWER. It's a cop-out, but more importantly, 
it's a cop-out that doesn't even work, and that just results in everybody 
having different setups. Then nobody is happy.

		Linus

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/