[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262360903262132n1f3d3c1ctbbafa1bc22dc3ddd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:32:05 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about PRIVATE_FUTEX
Hmm, It seems even shared futex, too.
After calling get_user_pages_fast, get_futex_key calls unlock, put_page, too.
Then futex_wait calls get_futex_value_locked.
Wouldn't kernel reclaim the page between get_fuex_key and
get_futex_value_locked ?
How do we make sure this race condition ?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi, Peter and Eric.
>
> I am not expert about futex.
> I am sorry if this is dumb question.
>
> If we use private futex, get_futex_key don't call get_user_pages_fast
> which pins page at page table.
> Then, get_futex_value_locked calls __cpy_from_user_inatomic with
> pagefault_disable.
>
> Who make sure the user page is mapped at app's page table ?
>
> --
> Kinds regards,
> Minchan Kim
>
--
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists