| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20090328150745.GC31080@8bytes.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:07:45 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:18:50PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> The following changes since commit 29219683c46cb89edf5c58418b5305b14646d030:
> Ingo Molnar (1):
> Merge branches 'x86/apic', 'x86/cleanups', 'x86/mm', 'x86/pat', 'x86/setup' and 'x86/signal'; commit 'v2.6.29' into x86/core
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-Xmas.git x86/core
>
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput (49):
> x86: process_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: signal.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: entry_32.S include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: traps.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: irq.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: irq_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: dumpstack.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: time_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: ioport.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: ldt.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: dumpstack_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: setup.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: i8259.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: irqinit_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: probe_roms_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: sys_i386_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: i386_ksyms_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: bootflag.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: e820.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: pci-dma.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: quirks.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: i8237.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: alternative.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: tsc.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: process.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: xsave.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: ptrace.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: ds.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: tls.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: step.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: stacktrace.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: reboot.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: msr.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: cpuid.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: early-quirks.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: smp.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: smpboot.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: tsc_sync.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: setup_percpu.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: trampoline_32.S include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: mpparse.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: module_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: doublefault_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: vm86_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> ix86: early_printk.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: pcspeaker.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: head_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: head.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> x86: init_task.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
Where have you sent these patches for review?
> Complete diff:
No. Complete diffs are not easy to review. At least not in this size.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
> index 49fb3ec..a8d63be 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
>
> extern void early_idt_handler(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> extern void system_call(void);
> +#endif
> extern void syscall_init(void);
>
> extern void ia32_syscall(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h
> index ad1478c..f80df2e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> #ifndef _ASM_X86_SIGCONTEXT32_H
> #define _ASM_X86_SIGCONTEXT32_H
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> /* signal context for 32bit programs. */
> @@ -73,5 +74,5 @@ struct sigcontext_ia32 {
> unsigned int oldmask;
> unsigned int cr2;
> };
> -
> +#endif
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_SIGCONTEXT32_H */
This doesn't seem to be related to your header include rearangements.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h
> index 1def601..dff6e11 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> /* two abstractions specific to kernel/smpboot.c, mainly to cater to visws
> * which needs to alter them. */
>
> +#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> +
> static inline void smpboot_clear_io_apic_irqs(void)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> index 77cfb2c..1f23e58 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -194,10 +194,12 @@ extern int __node_distance(int, int);
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
>
> +#if 0
> static inline int numa_node_id(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
"#if 0" ???
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists