linux-kernel - Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090328155837.GA3503@x200.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:58:37 +0300
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 03:55:49PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > kenel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-Xmas.git x86/core
> > > 
> > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (49):
> > >       x86: process_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > 
> > What the heck is this?
> 
> Does inverse christmas tree effect not translate well. It could perhaps
> have been more clearly explained.
> 
> Getting the includes under control is a good thing and saves everyone
> time.

Moving #includes up and down is not getting them under control.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/