linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/58] move at91_ether's probe function to .devinit.text

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:27:32 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	"Uwe Kleine-König" 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
	Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@...tonika.lt>,
	Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...s.ch>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/58] move at91_ether's probe function to .devinit.text

On Friday 27 March 2009, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> 
> > In this series, you cc'd me on four OMAP drivers
> > (mmci-omap, mmci-omap-hs, omap-rng, omap_udc) which
> > I *know* that's a completely workable -- and far
> > preferable -- solution.  There might be others.
>
> So if I convert them to the alternative fix, you volunteer to test these
> patches?  (Or at least provide your Tested-and-Acked-by:?)

Sure, those four plus at91_ether.  I've got that hardware
sitting around, and it's just build-and-boot.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/