[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090328224640.GA2465@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:46:40 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] blktrace: last round of fixes
* Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> This is the last round of fixes for blktrace, I hope. :)
>
> Changelog v1 -> v2:
> - fix a bug in "blktrace: make classic output more classic",
> and rebase other patches.
> - re-order patches.
> - a new patch for filtering BLK_TN_MESSAGE
>
> [PATCH v2 1/6] trace: make 'mem' argument of trace_seq_putmem() const
> [PATCH v2 2/6] blktrace: make classic output more classic
> [PATCH v2 3/6] blktrace: fix blk_probes_ref chaos
> [PATCH v2 4/6] blktrace: fix memory leak when freeing struct blk_io_trace
> [PATCH v2 5/6] blktrace: extract duplidate code
> [PATCH v2 6/6] blktrace: print out BLK_TN_MESSAGE properly
> ---
> blktrace.c | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> trace_output.c | 6 -
> trace_output.h | 5 -
> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
Li, Jens - what's your call for v2.6.30, can the blktrace changes go
upstream or should i zap the whole thing?
There are no new -tip test failures here so it's green as far as i'm
concerned. It's holding up the tracing tree so we need to decide one
way or another.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists