linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/58] move at91_ether's probe function to .devinit.text

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090328063211.GA1041@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Sat, 28 Mar 2009 07:32:11 +0100
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
	Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@...tonika.lt>,
	Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@...s.ch>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/58] move at91_ether's probe function to .devinit.text

Hi David,

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 05:09:37PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 27 March 2009, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > An alternative to this patch is using platform_driver_probe instead of
> > platform_driver_register plus removing the pointer to the probe function
> > from the struct platform_driver.
> 
> IMO that's preferable for this driver.  There's no
> point in doing anything other than discarding the
> probe() method after the driver has been set up;
> it'd be doing nothing except wasting memory.
> 
> Same thing for ... pretty much all other drivers
> for SoC platform devices.
> 
> In this series, you cc'd me on four OMAP drivers
> (mmci-omap, mmci-omap-hs, omap-rng, omap_udc) which
> I *know* that's a completely workable -- and far
> preferable -- solution.  There might be others.
So if I convert them to the alternative fix, you volunteer to test these
patches?  (Or at least provide your Tested-and-Acked-by:?)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                              | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                    | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/