linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm: maintain a percpu "in get_user_pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49CDD7B4.4020701@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:54:28 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/mm: maintain a percpu "in get_user_pages_fast"
 flag

Jeremy Fitzhardinge a écrit :
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> get_user_pages_fast() relies on cross-cpu tlb flushes being a barrier
>>> between clearing and setting a pte, and before freeing a pagetable page.
>>> It usually does this by disabling interrupts to hold off IPIs, but
>>> some tlb flush implementations don't use IPIs for tlb flushes, and
>>> must use another mechanism.
>>>
>>> In this change, add in_gup_cpumask, which is a cpumask of cpus currently
>>> performing a get_user_pages_fast traversal of a pagetable.  A cross-cpu
>>> tlb flush function can use this to determine whether it should hold-off
>>> on the flush until the gup_fast has finished.
>>>
>>> @@ -255,6 +260,10 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int
>>> nr_pages, int write,
>>>      * address down to the the page and take a ref on it.
>>>      */
>>>     local_irq_disable();
>>> +
>>> +    cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>> +    cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, in_gup_cpumask);
>>> +
>>
>> This will bounce a cacheline, every time.  Please wrap in CONFIG_XEN
>> and skip at runtime if Xen is not enabled.
> 
> Every time?  Only when running successive gup_fasts on different cpus,
> and only twice per gup_fast. (What's the typical page count?  I see that
> kvm and lguest are page-at-a-time users, but presumably direct IO has
> larger batches.)

If I am not mistaken, shared futexes where hitting hard mm semaphore.
Then gup_fast was introduced in kernel/futex.c to remove this contention point.
Yet, this contention point was process specific, not a global one :)

And now, you want to add a global hot point, that would slow
down unrelated processes, only because they use shared futexes, thousand
times per second...

> 
> Alternatively, it could have per-cpu flags and the other side could
> construct the mask (I originally had that, but this was simpler).

Simpler but would be a regression for legacy applications still using shared
futexes (because statically linked with old libc)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/