[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49CDFA60.9080403@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:22:24 +0200
From: Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@...il.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: "linux.kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux IDE mailing list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29 regression: ATA bus errors on resume
On 03/28/2009 12:30 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:10:52 +0200
> Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I'm seeing some dubious looking ATA messages even on 2.6.28.9-pae,
>> although with all the 2.6.28 variants I used s2disk/resume has always
>> worked. I was wondering if these "errors" perhaps play more of a role
>> in 2.6.29, perhaps due to the async. changes that was mentioned?
>>
>
> unless you actively enabled this via a kernel command line option there
> are no async changes in 2.6.29 in terms of behavior.
>
>
>
The only non-default option I had was 'modeset=1'. From Jeff's earlier
comment I understood the probing behaviour changed.
The fundamental difference is that in 2.6.29 everything initially seems
okay, but then there is a
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x3f SErr 0x50000 action0xe frozen
ata1.00: irq_stat 0x00400008, PHY RDY changed
There's nothing frozen it 2.6.28.
Should I log a kernel bug, what's the best way forward and is there
anything more I can do to help?
cheers
Niel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists