[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090328001432.5dd5f10f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:14:32 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, David Rees <drees76@...il.com>,
Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:38:35 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > And please add a tuneable for the flush. Preferable a generic one at
> > the block device layer instead of the current mess where every
> > filesystem has a slightly different option for barrier usage.
>
> At the very least, IMO the block layer should be able to notice when
> barriers need not be translated into cache flushes. Most notably when
> wb cache is disabled on the drive, something easy to auto-detect, but
> probably a manual switch also, for people with enterprise battery-backed
> storage and such.
The storage drivers for those cases already generally know this and treat
cache flush requests as "has hit nvram", even the non enterprise ones.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists