[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090328104857.GA10897@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:48:57 +0300
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc, Makefile: Make it possible to safely
select CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:49:29PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Can you ACK this patch? Or even take it in your tree?
Benjamin, have you had a chance to look into this? Sam, could
you also take a look?
Thanks!
> On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 19:44 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > This patch introduces ARCH_HAS_NORMAL_FRAME_POINTERS Kconfig symbol.
> > When defined, the top level Makefile won't add -fno-omit-frame-pointer
> > cflag (the flag is useless in PowerPC kernels, and also makes gcc
> > generate wrong code).
> >
> > Also move ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS's help text.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
> > ---
> > Makefile | 7 +++++--
> > arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> > lib/Kconfig.debug | 16 ++++++++++------
> > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index 46c04c5..bf41b05 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -538,9 +538,12 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> > endif
> >
> > ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> > + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> > + ifndef ARCH_HAS_NORMAL_FRAME_POINTERS
> > + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer
> > + endif
> > else
> > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fomit-frame-pointer
> > + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fomit-frame-pointer
> > endif
> >
> > ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > index 97f9a64..4587e66 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> > @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ config PPC
> > select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
> > select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> > select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB
> > + select ARCH_HAS_NORMAL_FRAME_POINTERS
> > select HAVE_IDE
> > select HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
> > select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > index 4b63b6b..fc8cd1f 100644
> > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -661,20 +661,24 @@ config DEBUG_NOTIFIERS
> > This is a relatively cheap check but if you care about maximum
> > performance, say N.
> >
> > -#
> > -# Select this config option from the architecture Kconfig, if it
> > -# it is preferred to always offer frame pointers as a config
> > -# option on the architecture (regardless of KERNEL_DEBUG):
> > -#
> > config ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> > bool
> > help
> > + Select this config option from the architecture Kconfig, if it
> > + it is preferred to always offer frame pointers as a config
> > + option on the architecture (regardless of KERNEL_DEBUG).
> > +
> > +config ARCH_HAS_NORMAL_FRAME_POINTERS
> > + bool
> > + help
> > + Architectures should select this symbol if their ABI implies
> > + having a frame pointer.
> >
> > config FRAME_POINTER
> > bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers"
> > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && \
> > (CRIS || M68K || M68KNOMMU || FRV || UML || S390 || \
> > - AVR32 || SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300) || \
> > + AVR32 || SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || PPC) || \
> > ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> > default y if (DEBUG_INFO && UML) || ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> > help
>
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists