lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0903291613360.20606@be10.lrz>
Date:	Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:25:54 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
cc:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TOMOYO in linux-next

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2009-03-27 14:04:32, Bodo Eggert wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> On Fri 2009-03-27 10:28:07, Bodo Eggert wrote:
>>>> Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:

>>>>> I don't think merging that is good idea. Security should be doable
>>>>> without making shell-like glob matching...
>>>>
>>>> How do you suppose a security system should handle mozilla modifying
>>>> ~/.bashrc differently from downloading something to ~/pr0n.jpg?
>>>
>>> How does shell-like glob matching help there? You'd need to parse
>>> /etc/passwd to find all ~ directories...
>>
>> That is, if you'd use HOME=`dd if=/dev/urandom ...`.
>>
>> If you have your users in /home/user, you can tell /home/*/.*
>> is bad, /home/*/[^.]* is OK.
>
> On the common systems I know of, homes are spread over different
> volumes and different directories. TOMOYO's wildcards do _not_ solve
> this particular problems.

Don't do that then. If you start having user's homes at 
/usr/local/sbin/something/, your systenm is FUBAR anyway.

Put your homes into /home/volume/group/user (=~ /home/*/*/*/.*).

>> How would you exclude mozilla from writing to .* then? ".a" is bad,
>> ".b" is bad ...? or "A" is OK, "a" is OK, "zzzzzzzzzzzzz" is OK"?
>> Either way, you'd need several universes to store the security profile.
>
> What is magic about .* files? I want mozilla to store the pictures as
> .naughty.picture.jpg -- I don't see anything wrong with that.

As long as you have a guaranteed-to-be-complete list of config files, you 
can get along without wildcards. And still if you do, I'll write a program 
to make it incomplete.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ