[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903291354480.3994@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@...e.fr>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rees <drees76@...il.com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Yep and twenty years on software hasnĀ“t improved
I really think you're gilding the edges of those old memories. The
software 20 years ago wasn't that great. I'd say it was on the whole a
whole lot crappier than it is today.
It's just that we have much higher expectations, and our problem sizes
have grown a _lot_ faster than rotating disk latencies have improved.
People didn't worry about having a hundred megs of dirty data and doing an
'fsync' twenty years ago. Even on big hardware (if you _had_ a hundred
megs of dirty data you didn't worry about latencies of a few seconds),
never mind in the Linux world.
This particular problem really largely boils down to "average memory
capacity has expanded a _lot_ more than harddisk speeds have gone up".
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists