linux-kernel - Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1238308734.3074.3.camel@ht.satnam>
Date:	Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:08:54 +0530
From:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches

On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 00:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Please find a better use for your time.
> > 
> > Imagine, there might be developers out there with real work
> > to do in these files: all you are doing is throwing silly
> > little obstacles in their way.
> 
> Actually, now is the right time to do such changes as we've just 
> pushed all pending x86 changes upstream. And since these changes 
> reduce the chance of future patch conflicts, they do help 
> development. (in a small way)
> 
> Nevertheless i'd suggest to make this a single commit, to not 
> clobber the shortlog with it.
> 

I think individual patches will be better option, in case of unavoidable
situation we can simply revert that particular patch.

--
JSR

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/