[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090330075246.GA16497@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:22:46 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/8] memcg soft limit LRU reorder
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2009-03-27 14:12:25]:
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>
> This patch adds a function to change the LRU order of pages in global LRU
> under control of memcg's victim of soft limit.
>
> FILE and ANON victim is divided and LRU rotation will be done independently.
> (memcg which only includes FILE cache or ANON can exists.)
>
> The routine finds specfied number of pages from memcg's LRU and
> move it to top of global LRU. They will be the first target of shrink_xxx_list.
This seems to be the core of the patch, but I don't like this very
much. Moving LRU pages of the mem cgroup seems very subtle, why can't
we directly use try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages()?
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists