[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D0B535.2010106@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:04:05 +0900
From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, David Rees <drees76@...il.com>,
Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
chris.mason@...cle.com, david@...morbit.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ext3: call blkdev_issue_flush on fsync()
Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
>>> To ensure that bits are truly on-disk after an fsync or fdatasync, we
>>> should force a disk flush explicitly when there is dirty data/metadata
>>> and the journal didn't emit a write barrier (either because metadata is
>>> not being synched or barriers are disabled).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
>>
>> Your patches do not seem to propagate the issue-flush error code, even
>> when it is easily available.
>
> Oops... you are right. I will fix that.
I reflected your comments in the new version of the patch set.While at
it I also modified the respective reiserfs and xfs fsync functions so
that, at least to some extent,they propagate the issue-flush error code.
I'll be replying to this email with the new patches.
Thanks,
Fernando
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists