[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zlf3mcg0.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:18:07 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: npiggin@...e.de
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 08/14] fs: scale inode alias list
npiggin@...e.de writes:
> Add a new lock, dcache_inode_lock, to protect the inode's i_dentry list
> from concurrent modification. d_alias is also protected by d_lock.
This would seem to ask for per object lock? Why not put it into the inode?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists