[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090330132208.GA30897@duck.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:22:08 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext3: Avoid starting a transaction in writepage
when not necessary
On Fri 27-03-09 19:03:41, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:23:46PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Fri 27-03-09 16:24:31, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > >
> > > We don't have to start a transaction in writepage() when all the blocks
> > > are a properly allocated. Even in ordered mode either the data has been
> > > written via write() and they are thus already added to transaction's list
> > > or the data was written via mmap and then it's random in which transaction
> > > they get written anyway.
> > >
> > > This should help VM to pageout dirty memory without blocking on transaction
> > > commits.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> > > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
> > Please, use the patch below instead (and I'd also wait a few days for
> > Mingo to check whether it also helps him). It also changes data=writeback
> > mode in the same way and it adheres to coding style...
>
> FYI, Looks like Linus has already cherry-picked your first patch from
> LKML and dropped it into mainline. My other two patches haven't gone
> in yet as far as I can tell.
>
> So we'll need to do a delta patch that has the differences from your
> new patch and what Linus has already pulled into mainline.
Thanks for letting me know. Attached is a rediff against current
Linus's tree.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
View attachment "0001-ext3-Avoid-starting-a-transaction-in-writepage-when.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2227 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists