linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <897274600903300722m1f07d3f0yaf21e6e6fae05dae@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:22:24 +0200
From:	"Morten P.D. Stevens" <mstevens@...-professional.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rees <drees76@...il.com>, Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29

2009/3/29 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>:

> Actually ext2 is more reliable in ext3 --

ext2 more reliable than ext3? Is this a joke?
ext2 is about 15 years and the worst linux file system ever. It´s
slow, no journaling...

ext3 is fast, rockstable and solid.

I think ext4 is more reliable than ext3.

-

Morten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/