[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D0258A.9020306@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:51:06 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, David Rees <drees76@...il.com>,
Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ext3: call blkdev_issue_flush on fsync()
Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> To ensure that bits are truly on-disk after an fsync or fdatasync, we
> should force a disk flush explicitly when there is dirty data/metadata
> and the journal didn't emit a write barrier (either because metadata is
> not being synched or barriers are disabled).
>
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
Your patches do not seem to propagate the issue-flush error code, even
when it is easily available.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists