[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090330115524.e78dbe14.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:55:24 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fs: move bdev code out of buffer.c
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:59:57 GMT
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> wrote:
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/linus/585d3bc06f4ca57f975a5a1f698f65a45ea66225
> Commit: 585d3bc06f4ca57f975a5a1f698f65a45ea66225
> Parent: 3ba13d179e8c24c68eac32b93593a6b10fcd1572
> Author: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> AuthorDate: Wed Feb 25 10:44:19 2009 +0100
> Committer: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> CommitDate: Fri Mar 27 14:44:03 2009 -0400
>
> fs: move bdev code out of buffer.c
>
> Move some block device related code out from buffer.c and put it in
> block_dev.c. I'm trying to move non-buffer_head code out of buffer.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
This patch moved the CONFIG_BLOCK=y declaration of freeze_bdev() out of
buffer_head.h and into fs.h. But it left the CONFIG_BLOCK=n definition
of freeze_bdev() in buffer_head.h.
I'd have noticed this earlier had this patch been in linux-next. But
despite having been apparently written over a month ago, it was never
(afaict) in linux-next.
This patch is missing Nick's Signed-off-by:.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists