[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ljqmlqm5.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:09:38 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<fernando@....ntt.co.jp>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, David Rees <drees76@...il.com>,
Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
david@...morbit.com, tj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] block: Add block_flush_device()
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> writes:
>
> As far as I know, reiserfs is the only one actively using it to choose
> different code. It moves a single wait_on_buffer when barriers are on,
> which I took out once to simplify the code. Ric saw it in some
> benchmark numbers and I put it back in.
>
> Given that it was a long time ago, I don't have a problem with changing
> it to work like all the other filesystems.
When it was a win on reiserfs back then maybe it would be a win
on ext4 or xfs today too?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists