linux-kernel - Re: Removing __kernel_old_uid_t, git_t, dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090330.141156.62568451.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	arnd@...db.de
Cc:	geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com, michal.simek@...alogix.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Removing __kernel_old_uid_t, git_t, dev_t

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:17:56 +0200

> dma_addr_t is a big mess that was traditionally defined per
> architecture, in lots of wrong ways, including the misconception
> of dma64_addr_t. Sparc64 still uses a 32 bit dma_addr_t, possibly
> because it always uses an IOMMU (?). It can save some space in
> scatterlists, but might come back to bite us if someone tries
> to build a sparc64 system with actual 64-bit DMA.

There is no reason to use anything larger than a 32-bit DMA address
type on sparc64, and using 32-bit saves lots of space in many
data structures so I am unlikely to ever change this. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/