linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] utrace-based ftrace "process" engine, v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090330151844.8b4eed0f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:18:44 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	oleg@...hat.com, adobriyan@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, fche@...hat.com, roland@...hat.com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, utrace-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] utrace-based ftrace "process" engine, v2

So we need to work out what to do about utrace and I feel a need to hit
the reset button on all this.  Largely because I've forgotten
everything and it was all confusing anyway.

Could those who object to utrace please pipe up and summarise their
reasons?

Just to kick the can down the road a bit I merged the first two
patches.  The ftrace patch merged about as (un)successfully as one would
expect.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/