[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D014F9.8000404@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:40:25 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] blktrace: last round of fixes
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> This is the last round of fixes for blktrace, I hope. :)
>>
>> Changelog v1 -> v2:
>> - fix a bug in "blktrace: make classic output more classic",
>> and rebase other patches.
>> - re-order patches.
>> - a new patch for filtering BLK_TN_MESSAGE
>>
>> [PATCH v2 1/6] trace: make 'mem' argument of trace_seq_putmem() const
>> [PATCH v2 2/6] blktrace: make classic output more classic
>> [PATCH v2 3/6] blktrace: fix blk_probes_ref chaos
>> [PATCH v2 4/6] blktrace: fix memory leak when freeing struct blk_io_trace
>> [PATCH v2 5/6] blktrace: extract duplidate code
>> [PATCH v2 6/6] blktrace: print out BLK_TN_MESSAGE properly
>> ---
>> blktrace.c | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> trace_output.c | 6 -
>> trace_output.h | 5 -
>> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
>
> Li, Jens - what's your call for v2.6.30, can the blktrace changes go
> upstream or should i zap the whole thing?
>
It should be find to merge tip/blktrace into .30, and we still have 2
month to fix remaining bugs, if any.
> There are no new -tip test failures here so it's green as far as i'm
> concerned. It's holding up the tracing tree so we need to decide one
> way or another.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists