[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49D1C543.3010307@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:24:51 +0800
From: Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
To: Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ftrace: Add check of sched_stopped for probe_sched_wakeup
We need check sched_stopped in probe_sched_wakeup() to stop tracing when an
user stops it.
But current code can also do the right thing(stop tracing after
echo 0 > tracing_enabled) just because tracing_sched_wakeup_trace() can return
on buffer->record_disabled.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
index de35f20..9117cea 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ probe_sched_wakeup(struct rq *__rq, struct task_struct *wakee, int success)
pc = preempt_count();
tracing_record_cmdline(current);
+ if (sched_stopped)
+ return;
+
local_irq_save(flags);
cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
data = ctx_trace->data[cpu];
--
1.5.5.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists